On the Soapbox

« I'm trying to figure this out... | Main | Fun with Google Trends »

HTTPanties

Wednesday, August 23, 2006
Keywords: Technology

Someone directed my attention to these products listed at ThinkGeek; there are even "action shots". I think it's hilarious; I've never thought of HTTP response codes in that way before. But now that I look back at the list of HTTP response codes with my mind in a gutter mindset, there are actually quite a few of them that are open to devious readings, including:

202 Accepted
300 Multiple Choices (think about that one...)
400 Bad Request
401 Unauthorized
402 Payment Required
405 Method Not Allowed
406 Not Acceptable
414 Request-URI Too Long (see page 69 of the HTTP/1.1 specs)
416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable
417 Expectation Failed
502 Bad Gateway
503 Service Unavailable

Speaking of the kinky, this Wall Street Journal op-ed about the "fertility gap" is worth reading.

This entry was edited on 2006/08/23 at 18:26:44 GMT -0400.

Comments
Post a comment »

No Comments

Leave a Comment

Name:
E-mail Address: (not displayed)
Comment:

Auto-formatting notes: Please separate paragraphs with one or more blank lines (i.e., double line breaks; single line breaks will be converted to BR tags). URLs will be auto-linked. The following HTML tags are allowed:
A, ABBR, ACRONYM, ADDRESS, B, BIG, BLOCKQUOTE, CODE, EM, H[1-6], I, IMG, LI, OL, PRE, SMALL, STRIKE, STRONG, UL